MissouriFlorissant

Stonebridge Florissant

6768 North Highway 67, Florissant, MO 63034 · St. Louis County · 120 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: STONEBRIDGE SENIOR LIVING (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Aug 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Feb 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Feb 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
May 25, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 25, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021120E
202310D
2024150F
202590E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.533.663.95bottom 47% in Missouri; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.240.490.69bottom 16% in Missouri; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.903.223.50bottom 38% in Missouri; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.330.48bottom 10% in Missouri; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)75.956.045.8bottom 8% in Missouri; bottom 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)75.047.842.9bottom 15% in Missouri; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.28, RN 0.23, weekend 2.69. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lierman, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2021
Amin, IqbalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Amin, IqbalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2008
Bridge Rehabilitation INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Bridge Rehabilitation INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Butz, GregIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020
Butz, GregIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2020
Cooper, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2022
Cooper, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2022
Doerhoff, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Doerhoff, EricIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Eldercare Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/14/2017
Eldercare Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2025
Enterprise Bank & TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2023
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2016
Lierman Family Co III LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2004
Lierman, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2005
Lierman, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Lierman, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pillars of North County Health & Rehab Center, the2.3 miFlorissant, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Hidden Lake Health Care Center2.5 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lakeview Post Acute2.8 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Delmar Gardens North2.8 miBlack Jack, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Atrium Place Health and Rehabilitation2.8 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Christian Extended Care & Rehabilitation3.0 miSaint Louis, MO★★★★★5/5
Crestwood Health Care Center3.4 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Estates of Spanish Lake, the4.1 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rancho Rehab and Healthcare Center4.5 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Estates of St Louis, LLC, the5.2 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Willowcreek Wellness & Rehabilitation5.3 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Arbor Hills Care & Rehab Center5.7 miFerguson, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Florissant →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265365.