MissouriBlack Jack

Delmar Gardens North

4401 Parker Road, Black Jack, MO 63033 · St. Louis County · 240 certified beds · avg 177 residents/day · certified since May 17, 1988

Part of chain: DELMAR GARDENS (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$39,299
Fines, last 3 years
4.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 2, 2023 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 2, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 10, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jan 8, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 8, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 8, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jan 8, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 8, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 8, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 8, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 8, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 8, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 8, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 8, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 8, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2020130F
2023102G ▲
202440D
202571J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $39,299, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 10, 2025Fine$39,299
Oct 6, 2023Payment Denial9 days from Dec 7, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.173.663.95top 28% in Missouri; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.210.490.69bottom 11% in Missouri; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.833.223.50top 22% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.110.330.48bottom 5% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.956.045.8top 17% in Missouri; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.18, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Delmar Gardens Enterprises INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/16/2003
Gabe Grossberg and George Grossberg, Trustees of the Henry and BarbaraOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/16/2003
George Grossberg and Gabe Grossberg, Trustees of the Henry and BarbaraOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%04/16/2003
Goldberg-Nom LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%04/16/2003
Grossberg, GabeIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest16%04/16/2003
Grossberg, GeorgeIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11%04/16/2003
Non-Gst Family Trust Est U/W of Israel Goldberg Fbo Janice BitanskiOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/10/2013
Non-Gst Family Trust Established U/W of Israel Goldberg Fbo Harry ZviOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/10/2013
Non-Gstfamily Trust Est U/W Israel Goldberg Fbo Diane FredmanOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/10/2013
Delmar Gardens Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2005
Grossberg, GabeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2003
Marx, KennethIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Marx, KennethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/11/2019
Oppenheimer, HowardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2003
Rodgers, LynnIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2020
Ulrich, AmberIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/07/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lakeview Post Acute0.1 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pillars of North County Health & Rehab Center, the1.0 miFlorissant, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Crestwood Health Care Center1.2 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Atrium Place Health and Rehabilitation1.6 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Christian Extended Care & Rehabilitation1.9 miSaint Louis, MO★★★★★5/5
Willowcreek Wellness & Rehabilitation2.7 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Stonebridge Florissant2.8 miFlorissant, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Hidden Lake Health Care Center2.8 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rancho Rehab and Healthcare Center3.0 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Arbor Hills Care & Rehab Center3.2 miFerguson, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Florissant Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center3.4 miFlorissant, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Estates of St Louis, LLC, the3.4 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Black Jack →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265325.