MaineLewiston

St Mary's D'youville Pavilion

102 Campus Ave, Lewiston, ME 04240 · Androscoggin County · 210 certified beds · avg 165 residents/day · certified since Feb 7, 1984

Part of chain: COVENANT HEALTH (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$22,205
Fines, last 3 years
4.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 15, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220D
2024120E
2025110E
202631J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $22,205, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 15, 2026Fine$22,205
Apr 15, 2026Payment Denial4 days from May 21, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaine avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.194.603.95bottom 32% in Maine; top 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.221.110.69top 35% in Maine; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.104.163.50top 45% in Maine; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.170.730.48top 9% in Maine; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.046.745.8bottom 42% in Maine; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.240.242.9top 42% in Maine; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.01, RN 1.17, weekend 3.93. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Covenant HealthOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%01/29/1992
St. Marys Health SystemOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/16/1983
Anthoine, MarkIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2008
Anthoine, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2008
Davila, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/29/2019
Geiger, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/29/2019
Grubbs, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/23/2019
Grubbs, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2025
Isaacson, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/30/2022
McManus, KathyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/03/2016
Ouellette, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/29/2019
Wood, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Wood, JosephIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Wood, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Wood, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Russell Park Rehabilitation & Living Center0.3 miLewiston, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5
Montello Manor1.3 miLewiston, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5
Marshwood Center1.9 miLewiston, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Odd Fellows Health Care Center2.3 miAuburn, ME★★★☆☆3/5
Clover Health Care2.6 miAuburn, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Market Square Health Care Center, LLC17.7 miSouth Paris, ME★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mid Coast Senior Health Center17.8 miBrunswick, ME★★★★★5/5
Horizons Living and Rehab Center17.9 miBrunswick, ME★★★★☆3/5
Norway Center for Health & Rehabilitation, LLC18.0 miNorway, ME★★★★★4/5
Hawthorne House19.0 miFreeport, ME★★★★☆3/5
Maine Veterans Home - So Paris19.3 miSouth Paris, ME★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lewiston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 205053.