How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
11 North Broad St, Salem, VA 24153 (opens Google Maps) · Salem City County · (540) 389-6305· 45 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1974 · Medicaid only — not Medicare certified
Certified for Medicaid only. It cannot bill Medicare, so a short post-hospital rehabilitation stay would not be covered the usual way here. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint F-0627
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 29, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| Oct 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 11, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Feb 11, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.61 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 17% in Virginia; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 14% in Virginia; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.05 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 17% in Virginia; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.76 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 10% in Virginia; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 11% in Virginia; top 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 12.5 | 48.2 | 42.9 | top 4% in Virginia; top 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.53, RN 0.90, weekend 3.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.53 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Snyder Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
All 1 owning or managing party CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salem Health & Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Salem, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Davis and McDaniel Veterans Care Center | 2.7 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Brandon Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Richfield Health Center - Salem | 3.9 mi | Salem, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Raleigh Court Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.9 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| South Roanoke Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.3 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Old Southwest Health and Rehabilitation | 6.5 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Our Lady of the Valley | 6.6 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Friendship Health and Rehab Center | 6.7 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pheasant Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation | 7.2 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Friendship Health and Rehab Center - South | 7.2 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Star City Rehabilitation and Nursing | 8.7 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 49E076.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details