How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
327 Hershberger Rd NW, Roanoke, VA 24012 (opens Google Maps) · Roanoke City County · (540) 265-2100· 253 certified beds · avg 230 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1974 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Oct 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Oct 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Oct 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.08 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 22% in Virginia; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.69 | bottom 47% in Virginia; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.37 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 25% in Virginia; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Virginia; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.1 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 49% in Virginia; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.0 | 48.2 | 42.9 | top 30% in Virginia; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.93, RN 0.48, weekend 3.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.93 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Friendship Health and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop, Nathaniel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Combs, Glen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2000 |
| Feinour, Edwin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/1990 |
| Friendship Foundation INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/11/1987 |
| Grove, Lucian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/1999 |
| Hoff, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/18/2017 |
| Johnson, Cynda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2011 |
| Lawson, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2007 |
| Mitchell, Cynthia | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2016 |
| Oelschlager, Kathryn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2011 |
| Sandel, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2007 |
| Shannon, Charles | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2014 |
| Shannon, Charles | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2004 |
| Williamson, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our Lady of the Valley | 3.1 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Star City Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.1 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Springtree Healthcare & Rehab Center | 3.2 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Old Southwest Health and Rehabilitation | 4.3 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Raleigh Court Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.5 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Berkshire Health & Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Vinton, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Davis and McDaniel Veterans Care Center | 4.9 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Daleville Health and Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Daleville, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Salem Health & Rehabilitation | 5.4 mi | Salem, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brandon Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 5.7 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| South Roanoke Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.3 mi | Roanoke, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Snyder Nursing Home | 6.7 mi | Salem, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Roanoke City, VA — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495092.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details