VirginiaSalem

Salem Health & Rehabilitation

1945 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, VA 24153 · Salem City County · 240 certified beds · avg 201 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1971

Part of chain: LIFEWORKS REHAB (64 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jun 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, approved x-ray services or have an agreement with an approved provider to supply them. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jun 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Dec 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 12, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930D
202230E
2024140E
2025110D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityVirginia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.063.673.95bottom 28% in Virginia; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.660.69bottom 39% in Virginia; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.423.213.50bottom 14% in Virginia; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.460.48bottom 36% in Virginia; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.048.145.8bottom 14% in Virginia; bottom 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.048.242.9bottom 30% in Virginia; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.14, RN 0.48, weekend 2.48. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
America West LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Charles 1994 & Family LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Charles 1994 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Charles 1994 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Edward 1998 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Edward 1998 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
KSS 2000 Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
ML 2000 Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
MRV West LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Redrock West LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Salem Holdings I LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/28/2021
Saul 2012 Family Grantor TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Saul 2012 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/28/2021
Pressman, JenniferIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2023
RCZBM West Manager LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Davis and McDaniel Veterans Care Center0.5 miRoanoke, VA★★★★★5/5
Brandon Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.0 miRoanoke, VA★★★★★4/5
Snyder Nursing Home2.3 miSalem, VA★★★★★4/5
Raleigh Court Health and Rehabilitation Center2.6 miRoanoke, VA★★★★☆3/5
South Roanoke Nursing and Rehabilitation4.1 miRoanoke, VA★★★☆☆2/5
Old Southwest Health and Rehabilitation4.2 miRoanoke, VA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Our Lady of the Valley4.5 miRoanoke, VA★★★★☆4/5
Pheasant Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation4.9 miRoanoke, VA★★☆☆☆2/5
Friendship Health and Rehab Center - South5.2 miRoanoke, VA★★★☆☆3/5
Friendship Health and Rehab Center5.4 miRoanoke, VA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Salem →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495087.