IllinoisOrland Park

Smith Crossing

10501 Emilie Lane, Orland Park, IL 60467 · Cook County · 92 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Jan 10, 2007

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$30,713
Fines, last 3 years
5.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 18, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 30, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 30, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Aug 10, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Aug 25, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jun 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Aug 10, 2023▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202381H ▲
202490F
2025143G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $30,713, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 18, 2025Fine$30,713
Jun 18, 2025Payment Denial4 days from Jul 11, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.392.993.95top 4% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.280.630.69top 8% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.032.673.50top 3% in Illinois; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.930.560.48top 13% in Illinois; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.144.545.8bottom 24% in Illinois; bottom 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.941.842.9bottom 40% in Illinois; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.43, RN 1.29, weekend 5.07. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Anello, AndrewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/1999
Anello, AndrewIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/1999
Anello, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/1999
Araiza, EmaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2013
Araiza, EmaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2013
Barrett, ThomasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Barrett, ThomasIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Barrett, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Haskins, AnnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2014
Haskins, AnnIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2014
Haskins, AnnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2014
Huguelet, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2022
Huguelet, MichaelIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2022
Huguelet, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2022
Lane, KevinIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Lane, KevinIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Lane, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Marneris, RaymondIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Marneris, RaymondIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
McGee, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Alden Estates of Orland Park2.7 miOrland Park, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Frankfort Terrace4.8 miFrankfort, IL★★★☆☆2/5
Warren Barr Orland Park4.9 miOrland Park, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Victorian Village HLTH & Well5.6 miHomer Glen, IL★★★★★4/5
Elevate Care Country Club Hill7.2 miCountry Club Hills, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Aliya of Palos Park7.9 miPalos Park, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Crestwood Terrace8.1 miCrestwood, IL★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Generations at Applewood8.5 miMatteson, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avantara Palos Heights8.7 miPalos Heights, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Harmony Palos8.7 miPalos Heights, IL★★☆☆☆3/5
Aliya of Crestwood8.8 miCrestwood, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Elevate Care Palos Heights8.9 miPalos Heights, IL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Orland Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 146110.