IllinoisChicago

Smith Village

2320 West 113th Place, Chicago, IL 60643 · Cook County · 78 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Sep 16, 1996

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$16,350
Fines, last 3 years
5.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 16, 2026 · F-0627 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.

Why it matters: A rushed or poorly planned move can leave a resident somewhere that can't meet their needs.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 21, 2026 · F-0602 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.

Why it matters: Residents can lose money, jewelry, or cherished possessions to theft or misuse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 1, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 13, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 13, 2025 · F-0909 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.

Why it matters: Poorly maintained beds and rails can trap or injure residents, sometimes fatally.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 7, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 16, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
May 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 21, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 13, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 19, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Sep 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Apr 7, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360F
202491G ▲
202552G ▲
202632G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $16,350, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 16, 2026Fine$16,350
Jan 21, 2026Payment Denial16 days from Feb 13, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.402.993.95top 4% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.150.630.69top 10% in Illinois; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.872.673.50top 4% in Illinois; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.940.560.48top 13% in Illinois; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.344.545.8bottom 18% in Illinois; bottom 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.341.842.9top 35% in Illinois; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.27, RN 1.12, weekend 4.74. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Araiza, EmaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2013
Araiza, EmaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2013
Jatis, MartiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012
Jatis, MartiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012
Marneris, RaymondIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Marneris, RaymondIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
McGee, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
McGee, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/23/2025
Sadok, SmainIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Sadok, SmainIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2025
The Washington and Jane Smith HomeOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2000
The Washington and Jane Smith HomeOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Belhaven Nursing & Rehab Center0.1 miChicago, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Avantara Evergreen Park1.9 miEvergreen Park, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Morgan Park Healthcare2.0 miChicago, IL★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Mercy Circle2.6 miChicago, IL★★★★★4/5
Landmark at 95th Rehabilitation and Nursing Center2.9 miChicago, IL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aliya on 87th3.4 miChicago, IL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Warren Barr Oak Lawn3.6 miOak Lawn, IL★★★★☆4/5
Thryve of Crestwood3.8 miCrestwood, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Bria of Forest Edge4.2 miChicago, IL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Aperion Care Midlothian4.4 miMidlothian, IL★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chicago →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145904.