KentuckyGeorgetown

Signature Healthcare of Georgetown

102 Pocahontas Trail, Georgetown, KY 40324 · Scott County · 65 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1977

Part of chain: SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE (67 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Dec 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 30, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (15 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940E
2021150E
202530E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.313.713.95bottom 47% in Kentucky; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.190.740.69top 8% in Kentucky; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.273.50bottom 46% in Kentucky; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.850.530.48top 10% in Kentucky; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.546.445.8bottom 40% in Kentucky; bottom 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.041.842.9bottom 48% in Kentucky; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 1.27, weekend 3.14. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Agemo Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
Jjla LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
LP CS Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2007
LPSNF II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
Steier III, ElmerIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
Wheaten LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2007
Gross, DannyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2022
Harrison, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2007

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Dover Nursing & Rehabilitation Center2.0 miGeorgetown, KY★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Home Place at Midway8.1 miMidway, KY★★★☆☆2/5
The Willows at Citation8.9 miLexington, KY★★★★☆3/5
Cambridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center9.9 miLexington, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Homestead Post Acute10.3 miLexington, KY★★★★☆3/5
Pine Meadows Post Acute10.5 miLexington, KY★★☆☆☆3/5
Lexington Country Place11.3 miLexington, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Willows at Hamburg13.7 miLexington, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Mayfair Manor14.2 miLexington, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lexington Premier Nursing & Rehab14.8 miLexington, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Willows at Fritz Farm15.4 miLexington, KY★★★☆☆3/5
Bluegrass Care & Rehabilitation Center15.8 miLexington, KY★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Georgetown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185141.