KentuckyLouisville

Chestnut Ridge Health & Rehabilitation

1015 West Magazine Street, Louisville, KY 40203 · Jefferson County · 92 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Apr 3, 2012

Part of chain: LYON HEALTHCARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 1.7★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
7
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 13, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 13, 2025 · F-0803 · triggered by a complaint

The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Why it matters: When menus aren't planned and followed properly, residents may not get the nutrition their health depends on.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 7, 2023 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 7, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 7, 2023 · F-0698

The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.

Why it matters: Mistakes in dialysis care can quickly become life-threatening for residents with kidney failure.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 19, 2023 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 19, 2023 · F-0740 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 13, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 7, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Aug 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Aug 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Aug 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Nov 27, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 27, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Nov 27, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 27, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 27, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (20 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201950F
2023235K ▲
202542J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.473.713.95bottom 2% in Kentucky; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.570.740.69bottom 41% in Kentucky; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.253.273.50bottom 3% in Kentucky; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.530.48top 17% in Kentucky; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)61.346.445.8bottom 11% in Kentucky; bottom 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.041.842.9bottom 21% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.40, RN 0.79, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Botwinick, MichaelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
JML 1836 Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
JNL 2024 Fam TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Joel a Schwartz 2017 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
MJL 2024 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Tziporah Schwartz 2017 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Anderson, RobertIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Anderson, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Anderson, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Autrey, SheritaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Autrey, SheritaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Autrey, SheritaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Carver, DillionIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Gottesman, DanielIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2026
Hackett, DebraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Hackett, DebraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
HVH Ky 10 SNF Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Idels, ShimonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Idels, ShimonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Ky 10 SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
River Oaks Health & Rehabilitation0.7 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆2/5
Treyton Oak Towers1.1 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Home of the Innocents2.0 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Kindred Hospital - Louisville2.1 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Village2.5 miJeffersonville, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Eastway Health & Rehabilitation2.8 miLouisville, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Nazareth Home Clifton3.3 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
Highlands Nursing and Rehabilitation3.4 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Sycamore Heights Health and Rehabilitation3.4 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Riverview Village3.4 miClarksville, IN★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Louisville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185468.