How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Sherwood Healthcare Center
4700 Elvas Ave, Sacramento, CA 95819 (opens Google Maps) · Sacramento County · (916) 454-5752· 62 certified beds · avg 58 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1971 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 9, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 17, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.95
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.34
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.61
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.95 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 37% in California; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.34 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 19% in California; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.61 | 3.90 | 3.50 | bottom 40% in California; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in California; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 29% in California; top 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 38.1 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.35, weekend 3.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.97 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sherwood Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrego, Marianna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Abrego, Marianna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Belton, Stacy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Belton, Stacy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Cepec, Milan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2019 |
| Cepec, Milan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2019 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Leung, Victoria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2024 |
| Leung, Victoria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2024 |
| Murray, Dustin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2020 |
| Murray, Dustin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2020 |
| Nunez, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2022 |
| Nunez, Maria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2022 |
| Sandigo, Augusto | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Sandigo, Augusto | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cypress Healthcare Group — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Woodside Healthcare Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 5/5
- Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5
- Auburn Ravine Healthcare Center — Auburn, CA · overall 5/5
- College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5
- Fair Oaks Healthcare Center — Fair Oaks, CA · overall 3/5
- Gold Country Health Center — Placerville, CA · overall 4/5
- Grass Valley Healthcare Center — Grass Valley, CA · overall 3/5
- Greenhaven Healthcare Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 3/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
- "What are your rules for bringing in my family member's favorite foods, and how are they stored?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the California midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 27 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 45 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McKinley Park Care Center | 1.2 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saylor Lane Healthcare Center | 1.4 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodside Healthcare Center | 1.6 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Asbury Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.7 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Sacramento | 1.7 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mid-Town Oaks Post-Acute | 1.7 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| University Post-Acute Rehab | 1.8 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gramercy Court | 2.8 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Pioneer House | 3.3 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Arden Park Post Acute | 3.5 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Bridgewood Post Acute | 4.4 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| North Pointe Care Center | 4.5 mi | Sacramento, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Sacramento, CA — 37 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Whitney Oaks Care Center — Carmichael, CA · overall 3/5
- Windsor Care Center of Sacramento — Sacramento, CA · overall 2/5
- Acc Care Center — Sacramento, CA · overall 5/5
- American River Center — Carmichael, CA · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055305.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).