Auburn Ravine Healthcare Center
750 Auburn Ravine Road, Auburn, CA 95603 · Placer County · 59 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1995
Part of chain: CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (31)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Sep 10, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 16 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.29 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 39% in California; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 28% in California; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.98 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 35% in California; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in California; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.5 | 36.7 | 45.8 | bottom 17% in California; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.9 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 39% in California; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.36, weekend 3.69. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypress Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Sanofsky, Jack | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Amaton, Roxanna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Amaton, Roxanna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Cokinos, Suzette | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Cypress Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Cypress Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/11/2025 |
| Davidson, Jamie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/22/2024 |
| Dobler, Stacie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jackson, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jones, Jamie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Jones, Jamie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/29/2024 |
| Kasza, Daniella | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rock Creek Care Center | 1.6 mi | Auburn, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Auburn Oaks Care Center | 3.0 mi | Auburn, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Siena Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Auburn, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westview Healthcare Center | 3.2 mi | Auburn, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Lincoln Meadows Care Center | 13.0 mi | Lincoln, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oak Ridge Healthcare Center | 15.9 mi | Roseville, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center | 16.2 mi | Roseville, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Roseville Care Center | 16.6 mi | Roseville, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Pine Creek Care Center | 16.6 mi | Roseville, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Folsom Care Center | 16.9 mi | Folsom, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gold Country Health Center | 19.2 mi | Placerville, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Pines at Placerville Healthcare Center | 19.8 mi | Placerville, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555645.