Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 27, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 27, 2025
$30,297
Fines, last 3 years
2.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2025
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 27, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Mar 27, 2025
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Mar 27, 2025
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Aug 25, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
Aug 25, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Aug 25, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Aug 25, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770
Aug 25, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Mar 3, 2020
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 12).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations:
1
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2022
All citations:
5
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2025
All citations:
12
Serious citations (G–L):
1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2020
1
0
D
2022
5
0
D
2025
12
1
G ▲
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Mar 27, 2025
Fine
$30,297
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
2.98
Virginia average:
3.67
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.34
Virginia average:
0.66
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
2.51
Virginia average:
3.21
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Virginia avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
2.98
3.67
3.95
bottom 23% in Virginia; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.34
0.66
0.69
bottom 13% in Virginia; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
2.51
3.21
3.50
bottom 19% in Virginia; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.21
0.46
0.48
bottom 19% in Virginia; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
45.1
48.1
45.8
top 40% in Virginia; bottom 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
30.0
48.2
42.9
top 19% in Virginia; top 29% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.38, weekend 2.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.36 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rocky Mount Health & Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020)
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
BNV Dynasty LLC
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Saber Healthcare Holdings LLC
Organization
Direct Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2018
Wiw Dynasty LLC
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Adkins, Kenneth
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
05/30/2023
Adkins, Kenneth
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
05/30/2023
Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020)
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/05/2023
BNV Dynasty LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/05/2023
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2018
Craft, David
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
09/30/2022
Craft, David
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/30/2022
Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020
Organization
Trustee of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
10/08/2025
Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/05/2023
Huntington National Bank
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
04/01/2024
Mitchell, William
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
07/01/2023
Nicoluzakis, Gregory
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
Old National Bank
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
04/01/2024
Rocky Mount Re Group LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
04/01/2024
Saber Governance LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Saber Healthcare Group — 126 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495118.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
The Care File
Visit checklist — Rocky Mount Health & Rehab Center
300 Hatcher Street, Rocky Mount, VA 24151 · (540) 483-9261
Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $30,297
Most serious findings on record:
▲ Mar 27, 2025 (F-0684, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Questions for the administrator:
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
☐ "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
☐ "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Virginia midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
While you're there, notice:
☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)
Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 495118 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)