TennesseeAshland City

Riverview Post Acute

111 E Pemberton Street, Ashland City, TN 37015 · Cheatham County · 95 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Nov 20, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 14, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 16, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 21, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201950D
202140E
202640F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.473.623.95bottom 50% in Tennessee; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.240.570.69bottom 3% in Tennessee; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.973.153.50bottom 46% in Tennessee; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.390.48bottom 33% in Tennessee; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.248.945.8bottom 38% in Tennessee; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.043.242.9bottom 22% in Tennessee; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.28, weekend 3.41. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hightower, JamesIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10/06/1995
Hightower, PatriciaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10/06/1995
Healthmark Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2015
Hightower, JamesIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/06/1995
Hightower, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012
Hightower, PatriciaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/06/1995
Hightower, PatriciaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012
Hightower, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Waters of Cheatham, LLC3.7 miAshland City, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
Eaton Creek Post Acute12.7 miNashville, TN—/5SFF
Whites Creek Wellness and Rehabilitation Center15.1 miWhites Creek, TN★★★☆☆3/5
The Meadows15.2 miNashville, TN★★★☆☆2/5
West Meade Place16.4 miNashville, TN★★★★★4/5
Advanced Health Care of Nashville16.9 miNashville, TN—/5
Signature Healthcare of Clarksville17.4 miClarksville, TN★★☆☆☆2/5
The Health Center at Richland Place17.5 miNashville, TN★★★☆☆2/5
NHC Place at the Trace17.7 miNashville, TN★★★★★4/5
Stoneridge Health Care, LLC18.3 miGoodlettsville, TN★★☆☆☆3/5
Green Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing18.4 miNashville, TN★★★☆☆2/5
Woodcrest at Blakeford18.8 miNashville, TN★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Ashland City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445316.