225 N Sowers Rd, Irving, TX 75061 (opens Google Maps) · Dallas County · (972) 253-4173· 120 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Mar 27, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 28, 2024 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Oct 4, 2023 · F-0773 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Why it matters: Delayed labs or unreported results can hold up a diagnosis and delay urgent treatment.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure resident assessments were done by a qualified health professional. Assessments guide all of a resident's care, so the person doing them must be properly trained. · F-0642 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint · F-0773 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jun 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 5 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $24,542.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | Fine | $17,096 |
| Oct 4, 2023 | Fine | $7,446 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.70 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 32% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.45 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 27% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 66.0 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.58, RN 0.30, weekend 2.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.58 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Avante Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKP Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| DKP Investments, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Hooper, Grady | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| LLLD Associates, LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| LLLD Associates, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Malik, Mohammad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Malik, Mohammad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Oxbow Healthcare, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Oxbow Healthcare, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/22/2025 |
| Port Au Prince LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Port Au Prince LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Prince, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Prince, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Prince, Danny | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Prince, Danny | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Hamilton County Hospital District — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir at Irving | 0.7 mi | Irving, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ashford Hall | 1.4 mi | Irving, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Villages on Macarthur | 2.5 mi | Irving, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Northgate Plaza | 3.0 mi | Irving, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 4.5 mi | Irving, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Heritage at Turner Park Health & Rehab | 5.2 mi | Grand Prairie, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lakewest Rehabilitation and Skilled Care | 5.7 mi | Dallas, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Forest Park Nursing & Rehabilitation | 5.8 mi | Dallas, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Renaissance at Kessler Park | 6.9 mi | Dallas, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Arlington Residence and Rehabilitation Center | 7.0 mi | Arlington, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Traymore Nursing Center | 7.1 mi | Dallas, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Villa at Mountain View | 7.5 mi | Dallas, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Dallas, TX — 81 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675908.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details