KentuckyLa Grange

Richwood Nursing & Rehab

1012 Richwood Way, La Grange, KY 40031 · Oldham County · 120 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Jan 12, 1998

Part of chain: PACS GROUP (274 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,788
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 31, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 31, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
May 17, 2018E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 17, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 17, 2018D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 17, 2018C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201840E
201910D
202581G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,788.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 31, 2025Fine$8,788

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.953.713.95bottom 17% in Kentucky; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.740.69bottom 35% in Kentucky; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.743.273.50bottom 29% in Kentucky; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.850.530.48top 10% in Kentucky; top 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.646.445.8bottom 39% in Kentucky; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.341.842.9top 34% in Kentucky; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.40, RN 0.79, weekend 4.08. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Providence Group NH, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%06/30/2023
Providence Group of Kentucky LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/03/2014
Apt, FrederickIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Einfeldt, BlairIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/15/2022
Hancock, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Jergensen, JoshuaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Omoruyi, OsawaruIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Springs at Oldham Reserve1.3 miLa Grange, KY★★★★☆3/5
Forest Springs Health Campus10.0 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆4/5
New Castle Nursing & Rehab11.0 miNew Castle, KY★★★★★5/5
Valhalla Post Acute12.5 miLouisville, KY★★☆☆☆1/5
The Willows at Springhurst13.2 miLouisville, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Bedford Springs Health and Rehabilitation13.3 miBedford, KY★★★★★5/5
Crestview Healthcare and Rehabilitation14.0 miShelbyville, KY★★★★★5/5
Rivers Edge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center14.2 miProspect, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Manor Rehab & We15.6 miLouisville, KY★★★★★4/5
The Episcopal Church Home15.7 miLouisville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Lyndon Crossing, LLC15.7 miLouisville, KY—/5SFF
Maple Grove Senior Living LLC15.8 miShelbyville, KY★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in La Grange →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185438.