TexasFort Worth

Life Care Center of Haltom

2936 Markum Dr, Fort Worth, TX 76117 · Tarrant County · 127 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Aug 5, 2002

Part of chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (194 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$22,205
Fines, last 3 years
3.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
202460E
2025110E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $22,205.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 9, 2026Fine$22,205

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.723.463.95top 23% in Texas; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.830.440.69top 6% in Texas; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.223.043.50top 28% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.550.340.48top 10% in Texas; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.255.345.8bottom 32% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.454.642.9bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.80, weekend 3.08. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Developers Investment Company II, INCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2007
Preston, ForrestIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2007
Preston, ForrestIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2007
Behnam, SoroushIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2017
Behnam, SoroushIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Berck, JosephIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Berck, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2022
Berck, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Butner, NancyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2018
Butner, NancyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2018
Cross, CindyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Developers Investment Company II, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2007
Fletcher, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Henry, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/16/1999
Lay, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2018
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Preston, AubreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Preston, ForrestIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2007
Preston, ForrestIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2002

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Richland Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente2.0 miFort Worth, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at Richland Hills2.5 miRichland Hills, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Glenview Wellness & Rehabilitation3.6 miNorth Richland Hills, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Park View Care Center3.8 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
North Pointe Nursing and Rehabilitation4.6 miWatauga, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avir at Emerald Hills4.7 miNorth Richland Hills, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Green Valley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center5.4 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Trinity Terrace5.5 miFort Worth, TX★★★★★5/5
James L. West Center for Dementia Care5.5 miFort Worth, TX★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Downtown Health and Rehabilitation Center5.6 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC5.6 miFort Worth, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
DFW Nursing & Rehab5.7 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fort Worth →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675935.