101 Reese Dr., Red Oak, TX 75154 (opens Google Maps) · Ellis County · (469) 552-0500· 144 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Dec 7, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 28, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · from a complaint F-0637
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · from a complaint · F-0637 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Nov 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $12,035.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 | Fine | $12,035 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.92 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 18% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.57 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 68.9 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 61.1 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.93, RN 0.42, weekend 2.59.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.93 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culp, Roland | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| HMG Park Manor of Red Oak LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Prince, Derek | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Prince, Derek | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2016 |
| Vratis, Kacey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Way, George | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain HMG Healthcare — 31 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 30 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | Desoto, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Windsor Gardens | 4.9 mi | Lancaster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 5.0 mi | Lancaster, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC | 5.1 mi | Desoto, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Desoto Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.5 mi | Desoto, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avir at Lancaster | 5.8 mi | Lancaster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lancaster Nursing & Rehabilitation | 6.0 mi | Lancaster, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.8 mi | Desoto, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Waxaha | 7.1 mi | Waxahachie, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cedar Hill Healthcare Center | 7.9 mi | Cedar Hill, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Williamsburg Village Healthcare Campus | 8.2 mi | Desoto, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Lennwood Nursing and Rehabilitation | 8.6 mi | Dallas, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ellis, TX — 10 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675431.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details