TexasLancaster

Lancaster Nursing & Rehabilitation

1515 N Elm St, Lancaster, TX 75134 · Dallas County · 120 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Oct 12, 1999

Part of chain: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE (149 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$56,554
Fines, last 3 years
3.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 1, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 2, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · May 2, 2024 · F-0725 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.

Why it matters: Understaffing means longer waits for help, missed care, and higher risk of falls and other harm.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (34)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 6, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
May 2, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Apr 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Feb 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 31, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Aug 31, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350E
2024182K ▲
202551J ▲
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $56,554.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 1, 2025Fine$36,480
May 2, 2024Fine$20,074

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.193.463.95bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.440.69top 28% in Texas; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.743.043.50bottom 34% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.340.48top 41% in Texas; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)92.555.345.8bottom 9% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.054.642.9bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.50, weekend 2.84. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Blake, GaryIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Blake, MalisaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Honor X Enterprises, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Blake, GaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Blake, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Blake, MalisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Blake, MalisaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Clanton, AustonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Clanton, AustonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Creative Solutions in Healthcare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Creative Solutions in Healthcare INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Eamiguel, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Eamiguel, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Huggins, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Huggins, LindaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Huggins, LindaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Lancaster I Enterprises, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Silva, PhillipIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2025
Stapleton, LillianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2025
Willig, ZacharyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at Lancaster0.3 miLancaster, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center2.0 miLancaster, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Windsor Gardens2.7 miLancaster, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Desoto Nursing & Rehabilitation Center5.4 miDesoto, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation5.6 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Park Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation5.7 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC6.0 miDesoto, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center6.0 miRed Oak, TX★★★☆☆4/5
The Villages of Dallas6.5 miDallas, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Williamsburg Village Healthcare Campus7.2 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
The Lennwood Nursing and Rehabilitation7.2 miDallas, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Southern Oaks Therapy and Living Center7.8 miDallas, TX★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lancaster →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675810.