CaliforniaTorrance

Providence Little Co of Mary Transitional Care Ctr

4320 Maricopa Street, Torrance, CA 90503 · Los Angeles County · 115 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Feb 8, 1980

Part of chain: PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 28, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202470F
2025120E
202680D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.494.313.95top 3% in California; top 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours3.050.610.69top 1% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.843.903.50top 3% in California; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)2.820.510.48top 1% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)24.536.745.8top 16% in California; top 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.138.142.9top 31% in California; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.85, RN 3.22, weekend 6.17. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Anderson, DonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2016
Anderson, DonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2016
Anderson, DonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/20/2016
Blair, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Blair, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Buck, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Buck, LindaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Crawford, IsiaahIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Crawford, IsiaahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Dufault, KarinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Dufault, KarinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Elmouchi, DarrylIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Elmouchi, DarrylIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Elmouchi, DarrylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Hejna, DianeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Hejna, DianeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2016
Hoffman, GregoryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Hoffman, GregoryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Hoffman, GregoryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Hughes, PhyllisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Earlwood0.1 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Torrance Care Center West, INC0.1 miTorrance, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Driftwood Healthcare Center0.1 miTorrance, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Bay Crest Care Center0.6 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Del Amo Gardens Care Center1.0 miTorrance, CA★★★★☆4/5
Beachside Post Acute1.6 miTorrance, CA★★★★★4/5
Torrance Memorial Med Ctr SNF/DP2.2 miTorrance, CA★★★★★5/5
Lomita Post-Acute Care Center4.0 miLomita, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Lawndale Healthcare & Wellness Centre LLC4.0 miLawndale, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Heritage Rehabilitation Center4.0 miTorrance, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Harbor Post Acute Care Center4.0 miTorrance, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Vermont Healthcare Center4.1 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Torrance →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056499.