CaliforniaTorrance

Beachside Post Acute

22520 Maple Avenue, Torrance, CA 90505 · Los Angeles County · 110 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1979

Part of chain: ABRAHAM BAK & MENACHEM GASTWIRTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 19, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 19, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Dec 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
May 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Nov 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023120F
2024110F
202580F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.954.313.95bottom 37% in California; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.620.610.69top 31% in California; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.683.903.50bottom 45% in California; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.510.48top 21% in California; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.836.745.8top 37% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.738.142.9top 30% in California; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.19, RN 0.66, weekend 3.90. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lehmann, KennethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest32%10/01/2019
Abak Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2021
Bak, AbrahamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2019
Bak, AbrahamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2019
Crest-Vest CorpOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/11/2019
Gastwirth, MenachemIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2019
Gastwirth, MenachemIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2019
Gewirtz, ChonochIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Lehmann, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2019
Lehmann, KennethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2019
Mgaz Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/27/2021
Muttalib, AzharIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Muttalib, AzharIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Pangilinan, VioletaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2023
Pangilinan, VioletaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Torrance Memorial Med Ctr SNF/DP0.8 miTorrance, CA★★★★★5/5
Del Amo Gardens Care Center1.1 miTorrance, CA★★★★☆4/5
Bay Crest Care Center1.5 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Torrance Care Center West, INC1.5 miTorrance, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Providence Little Co of Mary Transitional Care Ctr1.6 miTorrance, CA★★★★★4/5
The Earlwood1.7 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Driftwood Healthcare Center1.7 miTorrance, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Lomita Post-Acute Care Center2.4 miLomita, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Vermont Healthcare Center2.9 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sunnyside Nursing Center2.9 miTorrance, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Harbor Post Acute Care Center2.9 miTorrance, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Heritage Rehabilitation Center3.0 miTorrance, CA★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Torrance →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055531.