How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
272 Benedict Ave, Norwalk, OH 44857 (opens Google Maps) · Huron County · (419) 668-8101· 69 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Oct 21, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · from a complaint F-0729
The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. F-0758
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · from a complaint · F-0729 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings. · F-0606 |
| Aug 15, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Mar 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| May 30, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.92 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 17% in Ohio; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 22% in Ohio; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.74 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 11% in Ohio; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Ohio; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.8 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 30% in Ohio; top 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.69, weekend 3.54.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.72 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Norwalk Memorial Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fisher Titus Health | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2016 |
| Burkey, Brent | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/05/2018 |
| Burkey, Brent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/05/2018 |
| Burkey, Brent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2025 |
| Camp, Dennis | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Coriell, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Doughty, Dennis | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Hazel, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Huber, Jeffery | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Hughes, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2020 |
| Lendrum, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2020 |
| Mattner, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2024 |
| Mattner, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2025 |
| Roberts, Julie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Silvestri, Scott | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2025 |
| Zahler, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carecore at Gaymont | 0.9 mi | Norwalk, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Twilight Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.7 mi | Norwalk, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Vista Care Center of Milan | 4.4 mi | Milan, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bellevue Care Center | 11.3 mi | Bellevue, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Admirals Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation | 12.6 mi | Huron, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Parkvue Health Care Center | 13.1 mi | Sandusky, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Willows at Willard the | 13.4 mi | Willard, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Meadows at Osborn Park | 13.5 mi | Huron, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Concord Care and Rehabilitation Center | 13.6 mi | Sandusky, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Embassy of Willard | 13.7 mi | Willard, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Laurels of New London the | 14.0 mi | New London, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Ohio Veterans Home | 14.1 mi | Sandusky, OH | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365668.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details