IowaWaterloo

Northcrest Specialty Care

2001health Street, Waterloo, IA 50703 · Black Hawk County · 94 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1992

Part of chain: CARE INITIATIVES (43 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.97
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 1, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking.
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Oct 1, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jan 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Jan 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jan 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 30, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024141G ▲
202580E
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIowa avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.974.373.95bottom 36% in Iowa; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.830.850.69top 46% in Iowa; top 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.583.863.50bottom 41% in Iowa; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.510.48bottom 28% in Iowa; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.744.045.8bottom 39% in Iowa; bottom 45% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)61.942.142.9bottom 23% in Iowa; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.68, weekend 2.97. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Care InitiativesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/01/2012
Adams, RussellIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Adams, RussellIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2025
Baedke, CharissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Beal, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Beal, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Beal, MichaelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Bode, JesseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/18/2023
Bode, JesseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2025
Bowen, LaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Carothers, Mary JaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Childs, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2025
Corless, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Dixon, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2016
Drake, EmilyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2023
Gilyard, TanyaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2025
Krein, KeithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Kuhn, JeramyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Harmony Waterloo3.7 miWaterloo, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Ravenwood Specialty Care3.9 miWaterloo, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Friendship Village Retirement3.9 miWaterloo, IA★★★★★4/5
Pillar of Cedar Valley4.5 miWaterloo, IA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pinnacle Specialty Care6.0 miCedar Falls, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
The Suites at Western Home Communities6.2 miCedar Falls, IA★★★★★5/5
Martin Health Center, INC6.3 miCedar Falls, IA★★★★★4/5
Newaldaya Lifescapes6.6 miCedar Falls, IA★★☆☆☆2/5
Harmony House Health Care Center7.0 miWaterloo, IA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Cedar Falls Health Care Center7.5 miCedar Falls, IA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Waterloo →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 165165.