How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
710 South Kenwood Avenue, Moose Lake, MN 55767 (opens Google Maps) · Carlton County · (218) 351-9400· 60 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jul 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.12 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 35% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.88 | 1.22 | 0.69 | bottom 20% in Minnesota; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.57 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 31% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.69 | 0.48 | bottom 12% in Minnesota; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.8 | 42.2 | 45.8 | bottom 36% in Minnesota; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 40% in Minnesota; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.64, RN 0.80, weekend 4.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.64 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Moose Lake Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassia | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2018 |
| Cassia | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Dahl, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Kern, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Mackay, Marshall | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Nye, Gerald | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Parks, Charles | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Ramsdale, Scott | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Smith, Shawna | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Stadtherr, Seelochani | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Wilkerson, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Youngquist, Kathryn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cura of Sandstone | 22.2 mi | Sandstone, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Interfaith Care Center | 22.9 mi | Carlton, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The North Shore Estates LLC | 33.6 mi | Duluth, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Dove Healthcare - Superior | 35.9 mi | Superior, WI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Twin Ports Health Services | 36.4 mi | Superior, WI | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Viewcrest Health Center | 37.4 mi | Duluth, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa Marina Health and Rehabilitation Center | 37.7 mi | Superior, WI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayshore Residence and Rehabilitation Center | 39.5 mi | Duluth, MN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Franciscan Health Center | 39.5 mi | Duluth, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245491.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details