PennsylvaniaMcKeesport

John J Kane Regional Center-Mc

100 Ninth Street, McKeesport, PA 15132 · Allegheny County · 360 certified beds · avg 185 residents/day · certified since Jan 27, 1984

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$50,260
Fines, last 3 years
4.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 30, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 19, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 12, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 13, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 23, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 29, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Nov 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Nov 8, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 19, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Nov 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 3, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Oct 12, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 12, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 9, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230D
202351J ▲
202492G ▲
202511G ▲
202631J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

4 fines totaling $50,260.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 30, 2026Fine$16,967
Sep 19, 2024Fine$12,923
Sep 19, 2024Fine$12,924
Oct 12, 2023Fine$7,446

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.993.943.95top 13% in Pennsylvania; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.100.800.69top 17% in Pennsylvania; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.373.583.50top 16% in Pennsylvania; top 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.650.560.48top 27% in Pennsylvania; top 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.144.545.8bottom 28% in Pennsylvania; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.439.942.9top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 0.91, weekend 3.60. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
County of AlleghenyOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/20/1984
Bowser, NeilIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/24/2018
Bowser, NeilIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/24/2018
County of AlleghenyOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/20/1984
Herring, RasoniaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Herring, RasoniaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Herring, RasoniaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Riverside Health & Rehab Center0.1 miMcKeesport, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Eldercrest Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center3.6 miMunhall, PA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Rehabilitation Center at Jefferson Hills, the3.7 miJefferson Hills, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Southwestern Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation3.9 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Lgar Health and Rehabilitation5.2 miTurtle Creek, PA★★★★☆4/5
Rose Meadows Health & Rehab Center5.2 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
John J Kane Regional Center-Gl5.3 miPittsburgh, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Heritage Care Center6.6 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Squirrel Hill Wellness and Rehabilitation Center6.8 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Irwin6.8 miNorth Huntingdon, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Burgh Care Center6.9 miPittsburgh, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Whitehall Borough Post Acute7.0 miPittsburgh, PA★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in McKeesport →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395640.