How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
370 E Main St, Rossville, IN 46065 (opens Google Maps) · Clinton County · (765) 379-2112· 80 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Aug 3, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MAJOR HOSPITAL (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 5, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. F-0638
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Aug 16, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Aug 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.48 | 3.42 | 3.95 | top 7% in Indiana; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.99 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 8% in Indiana; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.30 | 3.01 | 3.50 | top 4% in Indiana; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 14% in Indiana; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 59.7 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 13% in Indiana; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 32% in Indiana; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 0.88, weekend 3.82.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.99 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Milner Community Health Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claxton, Ryan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2025 |
| Claxton, Ryan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2025 |
| Claxton, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2025 |
| Jackson, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/12/2013 |
| Jackson, Richard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/13/2013 |
| Li, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Li, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Milner Community Health Care, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2013 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Major Hospital — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mulberry Health & Rehabilitation Center | 6.7 mi | Mulberry, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Wesley Manor Health Center | 9.3 mi | Frankfort, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Clinton House Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 10.6 mi | Frankfort, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Elizabeth Healthcare Center | 12.0 mi | Delphi, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Creasy Springs Health Campus | 13.4 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Springs at Lafayette, the | 15.0 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Mary Healthcare Center | 15.1 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rosewalk Village at Lafayette | 15.3 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saint Anthony Rehab and Nursing Center | 15.6 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Indiana Veterans Home | 16.2 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Lafayette | 16.7 mi | Lafayette, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Healthcare | 16.9 mi | West Lafayette, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155676.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details