OklahomaLexington

Broadway Living Center

301 Broadway, Lexington, OK 73051 · Cleveland County · 101 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Aug 29, 2005

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings.
Jan 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 19, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 5, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 5, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 5, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 5, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 5, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 5, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202060E
202360E
202430F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.914.583.95top 5% in Oklahoma; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.470.410.69top 32% in Oklahoma; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.184.163.50top 9% in Oklahoma; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.110.280.48bottom 3% in Oklahoma; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.055.545.8
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.30, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Scearce, AudraIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/27/2003
Scearce, JoeIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/27/2003
Scearce, AudraIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2003
Scearce, AudraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2003
Scearce, JoeIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2004
Scearce, JoeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2004

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lexington Nursing Home, INC.0.6 miLexington, OK★★★★★5/5
Purcell Care Center1.6 miPurcell, OK★★★★☆4/5
Sunset Estates of Purcell1.7 miPurcell, OK★★★★☆4/5
Noble Health Care Center10.2 miNoble, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
24th Place15.7 miNorman, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Holiday Heights Healthcare16.2 miNorman, OK★★★★★5/5
Grace Skilled and Nursing Therapy Norman17.0 miNorman, OK★★★★★5/5
Ignite Medical Resort Norman, LLC17.2 miNorman, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Medical Park West Rehabilitation & Skilled Care17.6 miNorman, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lexington →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375491.