TexasMcKinney

McKinney Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

253 Enterprise Drive, McKinney, TX 75069 · Collin County · 125 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Feb 7, 1992

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Mar 9, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024110E
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.953.463.95bottom 20% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.440.69top 15% in Texas; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.383.043.50bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.340.48top 15% in Texas; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.755.345.8top 46% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)27.354.642.9top 14% in Texas; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.63, weekend 2.46. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Eastland Memorial Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2023
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Doshi, DipauniIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Doshi, DipauniIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Doshi, DipauniIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/18/2022
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Moonflower Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Moonflower Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Wilson, EdwardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Wilson, EdwardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Wilson, EdwardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2025
Wright, LabanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Park Manor of McKinney3.5 miMcKinney, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
North Park Health and Rehabilitation Center3.9 miMcKinney, TX★★★☆☆5/5
Belterra Health & Rehab4.4 miMcKinney, TX★★★★☆4/5
The Belmont at Twin Creeks4.6 miAllen, TX★★★★☆3/5
Victoria Gardens of Allen4.8 miAllen, TX★★★★☆4/5
Princeton Medical Lodge6.2 miPrinceton, TX★★★★☆5/5
Baybrooke Village Care and Rehab Center8.0 miMcKinney, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Garnet Hill Rehabilitation and Skilled Care9.0 miWylie, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Stonemere Rehabilitation Center9.1 miFrisco, TX★★★★☆4/5
Victoria Gardens of Frisco9.3 miFrisco, TX★★★★☆4/5
The Park in Plano9.7 miPlano, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Collinwood Nursing and Rehabilitation10.4 miPlano, TX★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in McKinney →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675004.