How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Mason Pointe Care Center
13190 South Outer 40 Road, Chesterfield, MO 63017 (opens Google Maps) · St. Louis County · (417) 932-8040· 63 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since May 19, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EVERTRUE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 22, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.85
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. F-0625
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 11, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 16
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 16 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.85
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.99
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.21
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.85 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 11% in Missouri; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.99 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 4% in Missouri; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.21 | 3.22 | 3.50 | top 14% in Missouri; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 17% in Missouri; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.3 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 13% in Missouri; top 37% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in Missouri; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.32, RN 0.88, weekend 3.75.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.32 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mason Pointe Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lutheran Senior Services | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2016 |
| Anderson, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Bantle, Julie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2019 |
| Beumer, Brent | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/27/2022 |
| Brown, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2018 |
| Christell, Roy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2017 |
| Drollinger, Diane | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2014 |
| Dunn, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2015 |
| Kuhlmann, Frederick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2015 |
| Marles, Adam | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
| Marles, Adam | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
| Marles, Adam | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2021 |
| McCline, Elise | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2021 |
| Meadows, Megan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2022 |
| Mueller, Harry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2016 |
| Schaefer, Ronald | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2023 |
| Schaefer, Ronald | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/06/2023 |
| Sneed, Chadwick | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2006 |
| Sneed, Chadwick | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2020 |
| Sombart, Lisa | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2017 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Evertrue — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Lenoir Health Care Center — Columbia, MO · overall 5/5
- Lutheran Convalescent Home — Webster Groves, MO · overall 5/5
- Lutheran Senior Services at Breeze Park — Saint Charles, MO · overall 4/5
- Lutheran Senior Services at Meramec Bluffs — Ballwin, MO · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 100 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delmar Gardens West | 0.0 mi | Town and Country, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Garden View Care Center of Chesterfield | 1.0 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brooking Park | 1.0 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Westchester House, the | 1.4 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Friendship Village Chesterfield | 1.6 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Athene Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.6 mi | Town and Country, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield | 1.7 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Surrey Place St Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing | 2.0 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens on the Green | 2.9 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Manchester Rehab and Healthcare Center | 3.8 mi | Ballwin, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Creve Coeur Manor | 3.9 mi | Saint Louis, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Country Villa Wellness & Rehabilitation | 4.3 mi | Creve Coeur, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in St. Louis, MO — 69 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- McKnight Place Extended Care — Saint Louis, MO · overall 4/5
- Monarch Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation — University City, MO · overall 2/5
- Nazareth Living Center — Saint Louis, MO · overall 1/5
- NHC Healthcare, Maryland Heights — Maryland Heights, MO · overall 4/5
- Normandy Nursing Center — Saint Louis, MO · overall 1/5abuse
- Oak Knoll Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Ferguson, MO · overall 2/5
- Parkwood Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Maryland Heights, MO · overall 1/5
- Pillars of North County Health & Rehab Center, the — Florissant, MO · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265071.