How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1790 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553 (opens Google Maps) · Contra Costa County · (925) 228-8383· 96 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Nov 12, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint F-0573
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint · F-0573 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 16, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Aug 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.48 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 29% in California; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 19% in California; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.06 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 30% in California; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 16% in California; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.3 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 20% in California; top 9% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 38% in California; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.30, RN 0.73, weekend 3.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.30 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Legacy Post Acute Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph, Tom | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2008 |
| Broach, Jasmine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2019 |
| Broach, Jasmine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/10/2019 |
| Bughio, Sara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Bughio, Sara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Castillo, Myla | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2024 |
| Castillo, Myla | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2024 |
| Clement, Sharletta | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2023 |
| Clement, Sharletta | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2023 |
| Cooper, Dustin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/29/2025 |
| Cooper, Dustin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/29/2025 |
| Cruz, Marissa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2024 |
| Cruz, Marissa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/07/2024 |
| Dantes, Alvin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2022 |
| Dantes, Alvin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2022 |
| Hernandez-Perdomo, Yesenia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2021 |
| Hernandez-Perdomo, Yesenia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2021 |
| Joseph, April | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Joseph, April | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Joseph, April | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
Showing 20 of 37 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 17 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alhambra Post Acute | 2.5 mi | Martinez, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | Concord, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willow Pass Healthcare Center | 3.9 mi | Concord, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Concord Post Acute | 4.0 mi | Concord, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Rosewood Post Acute | 4.1 mi | Pleasant Hill, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pleasant Hill Post Acute | 4.3 mi | Pleasant Hill, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Diablo Valley Post Acute | 4.6 mi | Concord, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Shadelands Post Acute | 5.6 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| La Casa via Transitional Care Center | 5.8 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tampico Healthcare Center | 5.9 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stonebrook Post Acute | 6.1 mi | Concord, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cent | 7.8 mi | Walnut Creek, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Contra Costa, CA — 30 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555684.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details