How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
87 Shattuck Street, Haverhill, MA 01830 (opens Google Maps) · Essex County · (978) 372-1081· 91 certified beds · avg 23 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. F-0685
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jul 30, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.06 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 8% in Massachusetts; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.69 | top 42% in Massachusetts; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.08 | 3.51 | 3.50 | top 15% in Massachusetts; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in Massachusetts; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.8 | 38.2 | 45.8 | top 5% in Massachusetts; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 42.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.19, RN 0.52, weekend 3.38.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lakeview House SKLD Nrsg and Residential Care Fac. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaurino, Kathleen | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1983 |
| Guarino, Jon | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1983 |
| Gaurino, Kathleen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1983 |
| Grimes, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2019 |
| Grimes, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2019 |
| Guarino, Jon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1983 |
| Guarino, Jon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1983 |
| Guarino, Jon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1983 |
| Romatelli, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2019 |
| Romatelli, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2019 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare Center | 1.6 mi | Haverhill, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 1.7 mi | Haverhill, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Baker-Katz Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr | 1.8 mi | Haverhill, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Penacook Place, INC | 1.9 mi | Haverhill, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Haverhill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.0 mi | Haverhill, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Whittier Bradford Transitional Care Unit | 4.1 mi | Bradford, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mill Town Health and Rehabilitation | 6.9 mi | Amesbury, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Maplewood Center | 7.1 mi | Amesbury, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Prescott House | 7.2 mi | North Andover, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadows, the | 7.2 mi | North Andover, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 7.3 mi | Methuen, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Adviniacare Newburyport | 8.0 mi | Newburyport, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Essex, MA — 45 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225401.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details