OhioConneaut

Lake Pointe Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

22 Parrish Road, Conneaut, OH 44030 · Ashtabula County · 74 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Feb 28, 1980

Part of chain: AOM HEALTHCARE (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 6, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jan 6, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Jan 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Oct 28, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law.
Oct 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Oct 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Oct 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Oct 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Oct 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Oct 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Oct 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021110F
202330F
202470F
202660F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.313.453.95bottom 1% in Ohio; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.300.600.69bottom 5% in Ohio; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.123.073.50bottom 2% in Ohio; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.420.48bottom 23% in Ohio; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)63.248.745.8bottom 15% in Ohio; bottom 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.043.942.9bottom 43% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.95, RN 0.39, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Goldstein, JefferyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest33%04/01/2017
Pointe Woods Investment LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2017
Sherman, AlexanderIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest33%04/01/2017
Sherman, SamuelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest33%04/01/2017
Sherman, AlexanderIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017
Sherman, SamuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ashtabula County Nursing Home7.2 miKingsville, OH★★★★☆4/5
Country Club Ret Center I I I11.2 miAshtabula, OH★★★★☆3/5
Carington Park11.8 miAshtabula, OH★★★★★5/5
Saybrook Landing14.5 miAshtabula, OH★★★★★4/5
Jefferson Healthcare Center16.5 miJefferson, OH★★★★☆5/5
Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr18.0 miAustinburg, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Rolling Fields, INC18.4 miConneautville, PA★★★★☆3/5
Pleasant Ridge Manor East/West18.8 miGirard, PA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Conneaut →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365441.