Rae Ann Geneva

839 W Main Street, Geneva, OH 44041 (opens Google Maps) · Ashtabula County · (440) 466-5733· 76 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 21, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Jan 20, 2026

Fines, last 3 years

2.26

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 20, 2026 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 34 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
Apr 16, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint F-0711

View all 34 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint · F-0711
Apr 16, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Jan 20, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686
Jan 20, 2026	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
Jan 20, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Jan 20, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
May 21, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868
May 21, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Apr 16, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Dec 24, 2024	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804
Dec 18, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725
Dec 18, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567
Dec 18, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
Dec 18, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Dec 18, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Dec 18, 2023	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607
Aug 17, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550
Aug 17, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Aug 17, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 15).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	9	0	F
2024	1	0	F
2025	16	0	F
2026	8	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityOhio averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

2.26

3.45

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.54

0.60

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.03

3.07

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Ohio avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.26	3.45	3.95	bottom 1% in Ohio; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.54	0.60	0.69	bottom 48% in Ohio; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.03	3.07	3.50	bottom 1% in Ohio; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.40	0.42	0.48	top 46% in Ohio; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	69.3	48.7	45.8	bottom 7% in Ohio; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	75.0	43.9	42.9	bottom 10% in Ohio; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.75, weekend 2.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.16 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rae Ann Geneva. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Gewirtz, Jonathan	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	13%	05/17/2022
Ra Assets Holdco LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	05/17/2022
Ra Investment Oh LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	35%	05/17/2022
Ra Opco LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	53%	05/17/2022
Gewirtz, Jonathan	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2022
Gewirtz, Jonathan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2022
Gewirtz, Jonathan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2022
Herron, Danielle	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2022
Lele, Shreeniwas	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2022
Neil Bay Management LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/17/2022
Neil Bay Management LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/17/2025

All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"How often does each resident's doctor visit and review their care in person?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 69% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 17 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Geneva Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing	1.0 mi	Geneva, OH	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Pine Grove Healthcare Center	1.2 mi	Geneva, OH	★★★★★	5/5
Madison Health Care	3.1 mi	Madison, OH	★★★☆☆	2/5
Cardinal Woods Skilled Nursing & Rehab Ctr	4.4 mi	Madison, OH	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Austinburg Nsg and Rehab Ctr	5.7 mi	Austinburg, OH	★★★☆☆	3/5
Saybrook Landing	7.7 mi	Ashtabula, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Carington Park	10.0 mi	Ashtabula, OH	★★★★★	5/5
Country Club Ret Center I I I	10.5 mi	Ashtabula, OH	★★★★☆	3/5
Jefferson Healthcare Center	11.2 mi	Jefferson, OH	★★★★☆	5/5
Ashtabula County Nursing Home	14.8 mi	Kingsville, OH	★★★★☆	4/5
Homestead II	15.7 mi	Painesville, OH	★★★★★	4/5
Heritage Healthcare of Painesville	17.6 mi	Painesville, OH	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Ashtabula, OH — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Andover Village Retirement Community — Andover, OH · overall 5/5
Eagle Pointe Skilled Nursing & Rehab — Orwell, OH · overall 3/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Geneva →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366047.