How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3901 Montecito Drive, Denton, TX 76210 (opens Google Maps) · Denton County · (940) 891-0856· 60 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Feb 19, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PUREHEALTH (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint F-0558
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. F-0851
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jul 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Sep 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
| Jun 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.91 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 17% in Texas; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 3% in Texas; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.37 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 21% in Texas; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 17% in Texas; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.2 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 31% in Texas; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 26% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.97, RN 0.94, weekend 3.42.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.97 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lake Forest Village by Purehealth. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bell, Kevin | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2024 |
| Campion, Robert | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2024 |
| KCCJ1 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2024 |
| Lbei Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2024 |
| LFV Ops Denton LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/01/2024 |
| Overhead Ops Investments III LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2024 |
| Legends III LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Leidholm, Theta | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Leidholm, Theta | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| LFV Ops Denton LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Management McOa LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Martinez, Freddie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Martinez, Freddie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Narreddy, Neelima | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| PPSG Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Purehealth — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.0 mi | Denton, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| University Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Denton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the Parkway | 3.7 mi | Corinth, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vintage Health Care Center | 4.6 mi | Denton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cottonwood Nursing & Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Denton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Denton Village by Purehealth | 5.6 mi | Denton, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Rambling Oaks Courtyard Extensive Care Community | 6.3 mi | Highland Village, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 8.5 mi | Flower Mound, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hollymead | 8.6 mi | Flower Mound, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lake Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 8.6 mi | Lewisville, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Longmeadow Healthcare Center | 10.9 mi | Justin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Prairie Estates | 13.9 mi | Frisco, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Denton, TX — 18 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455685.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details