How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1570 Nc 8 and 89 Highway, Danbury, NC 27016 (opens Google Maps) · Stokes County · (336) 593-2831· 40 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Jun 13, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Aug 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Aug 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Mar 9, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.97 | 4.01 | 3.95 | top 32% in North Carolina; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.69 | top 19% in North Carolina; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.39 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 40% in North Carolina; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 32% in North Carolina; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.0 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 4% in North Carolina; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 15% in North Carolina; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 0.71, weekend 3.03.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.54 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stokes County Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Dominique Fletcher 2018 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/28/2018 |
| Fletcher 2018 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/28/2018 |
| Fletcher, Christian | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/28/2018 |
| Lifebrite Hospital Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/13/2016 |
| Lifebrite Laboratories, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/30/2017 |
| Fletcher, Amber | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2017 |
| Fletcher, Amber | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2017 |
| Fletcher, Amber | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2017 |
| Fletcher, Christian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2017 |
| Fletcher, Christian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2017 |
| Fletcher, Christian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2017 |
| Lifebrite Hospital Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2016 |
| Lifebrite Hospital Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2025 |
| Tillman, Pamela | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2017 |
| Tillman, Pamela | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2017 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walnut Cove Health and Rehabilitation | 9.4 mi | Walnut Cove, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| King Health and Rehabilitation Center | 12.2 mi | King, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Village Care of King | 13.1 mi | King, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Blue Ridge Therapy Connection | 15.3 mi | Stuart, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation | 15.4 mi | Winston Salem, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mill Creek Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 18.1 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Jacob's Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 18.3 mi | Madison, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brookridge Retirement Community | 19.1 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Salemtowne | 19.2 mi | Winston-Salem, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Countryside | 19.3 mi | Stokesdale, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345166.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details