MassachusettsFall River

Kimwell Nursing and Rehabilitation

495 New Boston Road, Fall River, MA 02720 · Bristol County · 124 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Feb 16, 1970

Part of chain: BEST CARE SERVICES (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,278
Fines, last 3 years
3.48
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 7, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 16, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role.
Dec 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Dec 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Dec 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Dec 16, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Aug 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360E
2024100E
202511G ▲
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,278.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 7, 2025Fine$8,278

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.483.893.95bottom 32% in Massachusetts; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.500.650.69bottom 32% in Massachusetts; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.043.513.50bottom 24% in Massachusetts; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.460.48top 49% in Massachusetts; top 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.038.245.8bottom 43% in Massachusetts; top 36% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.042.642.9bottom 37% in Massachusetts; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.52, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chapler, YaakovIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Steinberg, MosheIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Al-Madi, SamiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Bonadio & Co LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Bonadio & Co LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025
Chapler, YaakovIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Hinedi, TamimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Hinedi, TamimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
McNaughton, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
McNaughton, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Reliant Pro Rehab, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Reliant Pro Rehab, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025
Steinberg, MosheIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Steinberg, MosheIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Twomagnets LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Twomagnets LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Fall River Jewish Home0.3 miFall River, MA★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Grove at Carvalho0.6 miFall River, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Fall River Healthcare1.2 miFall River, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Clifton Rehabilitation Nursing Center1.8 miSomerset, MA★★★★☆4/5
Somerset Ridge Center1.8 miSomerset, MA★★★★☆4/5
Catholic Memorial Home1.9 miFall River, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Mill Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.0 miFall River, MA★★★★☆3/5
Sarah S Brayton Center3.6 miFall River, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Crestwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center INC6.3 miWarren, RI★★★★★5/5
Grace Barker Nursing Center6.7 miWarren, RI★★★★☆4/5
Warren Operations Ri, LLC DBA Warren Center6.8 miWarren, RI★★★★☆4/5
The Dawn Hill Home for Rehab and Healthcare7.0 miBristol, RI★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fall River →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225194.