OhioGarfield Heights

Jennings Hall

10204 Granger Road, Garfield Heights, OH 44125 · Cuyahoga County · 156 certified beds · avg 160 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1996

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Oct 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint
Oct 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
May 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202260E
202320D
202450F
202540D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.303.453.95bottom 48% in Ohio; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.390.600.69bottom 19% in Ohio; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.933.073.50bottom 49% in Ohio; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.420.48bottom 14% in Ohio; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.648.745.8bottom 50% in Ohio; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)39.143.942.9top 42% in Ohio; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.43, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Jennings Center for Older AdultsOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2015
Bollin, MatthewIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2014
Bollin, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2014
Salopeck, AllisonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2014
Salopeck, AllisonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Snf-The Villa at Marymount2.6 miGarfield Heights, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Seven Hills Health & Rehab Center3.6 miSeven Hills, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Phoenix of Maple Heights3.8 miMaple Heights, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Avenue Care and Rehabilitation Center, the3.8 miWarrensville Heights, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harvard Gardens Rehabilitation & Care Center4.1 miCleveland, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Suburban Healthcare and Rehabilitation4.1 miNorth Randall, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Broadview Multi Care Center4.2 miParma, OH★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Parma Care Center4.2 miParma, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.1 miShaker Heights, OH★★★★★4/5
University Manor Health & Reha5.6 miCleveland, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Garfield Heights →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366045.