IdahoBoise

Arbor Valley of Cascadia

8211 Ustick Road, Boise, ID 83704 · Ada County · 148 certified beds · avg 137 residents/day · certified since Jan 28, 1980

Part of chain: CASCADIA HEALTHCARE (46 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Apr 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 2, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 2, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230E
2024110E
2025110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIdaho avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.724.033.95bottom 4% in Idaho; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.870.69bottom 14% in Idaho; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.313.483.50bottom 4% in Idaho; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.560.48bottom 35% in Idaho; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.750.345.8bottom 32% in Idaho; bottom 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.941.042.9bottom 45% in Idaho; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.63, weekend 2.97. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2025
Hammond, OwenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Hopkins, NicholasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2025
Hopkins, NicholasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Timberline Ohi Tenant LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
White Oak Healthcare Finance LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Williams, RyanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Williams, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/18/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Timber Springs Transitional Care1.6 miBoise, ID★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Cascadia of Boise1.9 miBoise, ID★☆☆☆☆2/5
Life Care Center of Treasure Valley2.0 miBoise, ID★★★★☆3/5
Life Care Center of Boise2.1 miBoise, ID★★★★★4/5
Skyline Transitional Care Center3.0 miBoise, ID★★★★☆4/5
Sunterra Springs Riverview3.3 miBoise, ID★★★★☆3/5
Idaho State Veterans Home - Boise4.6 miBoise, ID★★☆☆☆1/5
Meridian Meadows Transitional Care4.6 miMeridian, ID★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aspen Transitional Rehabilitation4.9 miMeridian, ID★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Shaw Mountain of Cascadia5.2 miBoise, ID★★★☆☆2/5
Creekside Transitional Care and Rehabilitation6.7 miMeridian, ID★★★★☆3/5
Terraces of Boise, the9.2 miBoise, ID★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Boise →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 135079.