GeorgiaRome

Harborview Rome

1345 Redmond Circle, Rome, GA 30165 · Floyd County · 100 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1989

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.18
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 28, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 1, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (11)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 28, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202440D
202571G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityGeorgia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.183.543.95bottom 32% in Georgia; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.500.69bottom 47% in Georgia; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.723.093.50bottom 31% in Georgia; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.350.48bottom 43% in Georgia; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.546.045.8bottom 47% in Georgia; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)18.244.542.9top 9% in Georgia; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.44, RN 0.47, weekend 2.95. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ga NC 14, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2022
Englander, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Leibowitz, ChaimIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Lynn, JenniferIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Martens, ThomasIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Magnolia Place Nursing and Rehabilitation0.3 miRome, GA★★★★★5/5
Pruitthealth - Rome1.9 miRome, GA★★☆☆☆1/5
Fifth Avenue Health Care2.4 miRome, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Etowah Landing3.3 miRome, GA★★☆☆☆3/5
Winthrop Health and Rehabilitation5.2 miRome, GA★★★★☆4/5
Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation Center5.6 miRome, GA★★★☆☆3/5
Chulio Hills Health and Rehab10.7 miRome, GA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Oakview Health and Rehabilitation16.2 miSummerville, GA★★★★☆4/5
Cedar Valley Nsg & Rehab Ctr18.9 miCedartown, GA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rome →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 115363.