How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
800 Mulholland Road, Bay City, MI 48708 (opens Google Maps) · Bay County · (989) 895-8539· 51 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PREFERRED CARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. F-0725
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Jul 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Sep 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.20 | 4.32 | 3.95 | bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.12 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 19% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.84 | 3.79 | 3.50 | bottom 3% in Michigan; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.76 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.9 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 45% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 29% in Michigan; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.00, RN 1.05, weekend 2.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.00 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hampton Nursing and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green, Dov | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 35% | 03/15/2023 |
| Hampton Opco Holding LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/15/2023 |
| Klein, Yoni | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 40% | 03/15/2023 |
| Schnell, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 03/15/2023 |
| Ahmed, Naeem | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Green, Dov | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Hampton Propco Holding LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Hampton Propco Holding LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Klein, Yoni | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Klein, Yoni | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| P&M Holding Group LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Preferred Care at Lansing MNGT LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Rubinfeld, Eli | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Schild, Theodora | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Schild, Theodora | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Schnell, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2023 |
| Zigdon & Associates PC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Preferred Care — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bay Shores Senior Care and Rehab Center | 3.0 mi | Bay City, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bay County Medical Care Facility | 4.0 mi | Essexville, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Carriage House Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Bay City, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Caretel Inns of Tri-Cities | 5.1 mi | Bay City, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Huron Woods Nursing Center | 9.4 mi | Kawkawlin, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Great Lakes Rehabilitation Center | 9.6 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hoyt Nursing & Rehab Centre | 10.6 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saginaw Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 11.4 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Adira Nursing and Rehabilitation | 11.7 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Covenant Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation at Wel | 12.3 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Healthsource Saginaw, INC | 12.7 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avista Nursing and Rehabilitation | 14.3 mi | Saginaw, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235411.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details