Grand Park Convalescent Hospital

Name: Grand Park Convalescent Hospital
Address: 2312 WEST 8TH STREET, Los Angeles, CA, 90057, US
Telephone: 2133827315

2312 West 8th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057 · Los Angeles County · 151 certified beds · avg 147 residents/day · certified since Nov 17, 1970

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.09

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 7, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. · from a complaint
Jul 3, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jul 3, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jul 3, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 3, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 3, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 3, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 3, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 3, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 3, 2025	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Oct 30, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 7, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 20, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location.
Jun 20, 2024	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jan 24, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · from a complaint
Dec 17, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 17, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 9).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2021	9	E
2023	1	D
2024	17	E
2025	9	E
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.09	4.31	3.95	bottom 48% in California; top 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.42	0.61	0.69	bottom 36% in California; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.71	3.90	3.50	bottom 48% in California; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.36	0.51	0.48	bottom 47% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	36.7	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.45, RN 0.45, weekend 4.04. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Kohn, Barry	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/02/1991
Constantino, Marie	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/03/2025
Constantino, Marie	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/03/2025
Gonzalez, Mario	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/07/2004
Gonzalez, Mario	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/07/2004
Hernandez, David	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/16/2024
Hernandez, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/16/2024
Kohn, Barry	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/02/1991
Kohn, Barry	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/02/1991
Kohn, Barry	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/02/1991
Kohn, Barry	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1991
Morales, Isauro	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/16/2024
Morales, Isauro	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/16/2024
Pak, Sunny	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/20/2023
Pak, Sunny	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/20/2023
Schmukler, Yehuda	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/02/2012
Schmukler, Yehuda	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/02/2012
Solomon, Ilana	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/20/2025
Solomon, Ilana	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/20/2025
Tadeo, Marisela	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/02/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Alta View Post Acute	0.1 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
California Post Acute	0.1 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Olympia Convalescent Hospital	0.4 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Alvarado Care Center	0.4 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Alden Terrace Convalescent Hospital	0.5 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Mid-Wilshire Health Care CNTR	0.6 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Pih Health Good Samaritan Hospital D/P SNF	0.6 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Burlington Convalescent Hospital	0.6 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Angels Nursing Health Center	0.6 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Bonnie Brae Skilled Nursing	0.7 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Westlake Convalescent Hospital	0.7 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
The Rehabilitation Center of Los Angeles	0.7 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Los Angeles →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056244.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Grand Park Convalescent Hospital

2312 West 8th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057 · 2133827315

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What training do new hires get before working with residents, and what ongoing training do all staff receive?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 056244 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)