California ›Rosemead

Green Acres Healthcare Center

8101 E Hill Drive, Rosemead, CA 91770 · Los Angeles County · 85 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Mar 14, 2000

Part of chain: LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$57,016
Fines, last 3 years
5.37
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (54)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Mar 13, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 7, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 7, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016.
Feb 7, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Feb 7, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility's bedrooms did not open directly onto an exit hallway. Rooms must connect to a hallway so residents can get out quickly in an emergency.
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs.
Feb 9, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016.
Feb 9, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Feb 9, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility's bedrooms did not open directly onto an exit hallway. Rooms must connect to a hallway so residents can get out quickly in an emergency.
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
2024300F
2025140F
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $57,016, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 9, 2024Fine$57,016
Feb 9, 2024Payment Denial24 days from Mar 12, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.374.313.95top 9% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.610.69bottom 44% in California; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.803.903.50top 9% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.510.48bottom 4% in California; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.736.745.8bottom 48% in California; top 28% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)55.638.142.9bottom 20% in California; bottom 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.90, RN 0.33, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Aaron Friedman Group a Business Assets TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest20%06/30/2023
Devorah Danziger Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Elka Kaplan Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Esther Hoff Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Friedman, AaronIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—06/30/2023
Ira David Friedman Group a Business Assets TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest20%06/30/2023
JRB Investments LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/30/2023
Mordechai Notis Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Rachel Notis Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Sarah Dunner Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Yehoshua Notis Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Yisroel Notis Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Aaron Friedman Group a Business Assets TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
De Castro, MartinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/19/2023
De Castro, MartinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/19/2023
Friedman Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Friedman, AaronIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/10/2025
Friedman, AaronIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Friedman, AaronIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Friedman, IraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
San Gabriel Conv Center0.0 miRosemead, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP0.1 miRosemead, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Del Mar Convalescent Hospital1.5 miRosemead, CA★★★★★4/5
Rio Hondo Subacute & Nursing Center2.1 miMontebello, CA—/5SFF
Monterey Park Conv Hosp2.2 miMonterey Park, CA★★★★★4/5
Montebello Care Center2.2 miMontebello, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Heritage Manor2.3 miMonterey Park, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Greater el Monte Community Hos2.9 miEl Monte, CA★★★★☆4/5
Sunset Manor Conv Hosp3.0 miEl Monte, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Rosemead Healthcare Center3.1 miEl Monte, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Mission Care Center3.1 miRosemead, CA★★★★☆3/5
Valley View Post Acute3.1 miEl Monte, CA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Rosemead →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555755.