CaliforniaLos Angeles

Angels Nursing Health Center

415 S Union Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90017 · Los Angeles County · 49 certified beds · avg 45 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1973

Part of chain: AARON MAYER (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$71,566
Fines, last 3 years
5.65
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 30, 2024 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 30, 2024 · F-0813

The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.

Why it matters: Without safe-handling rules, food from outside can spoil or be given to residents whose diets it could harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 14, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 30, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 27, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Jul 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 30, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Apr 30, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 30, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Apr 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Apr 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Apr 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024204J ▲
2025100E
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $71,566, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 16, 2024Fine$37,681
Jul 16, 2024Payment Denial5 days from Aug 14, 2024
Apr 30, 2024Fine$33,885

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.654.313.95top 6% in California; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.610.69top 40% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.203.903.50top 5% in California; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.510.48bottom 18% in California; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.936.745.8bottom 22% in California; bottom 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.56, RN 0.44, weekend 4.19. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ahm Family Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Amc Family Holding LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Amm Family Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Asm Family Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Atr Family Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Deutsch 2016 GratOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest72%05/15/2016
Deutsch, IsaacIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest72%05/11/2023
ZM Family Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Deutsch, IsaacIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Deutsch, IsaacIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Deutsch, IsaacIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2016
Deutsch, IsaacIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2022
Diego, LoraineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Diego, LoraineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Mayer, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2005
Obinwa, AmucheIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2022
Obinwa, AmucheIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/19/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bonnie Brae Skilled Nursing0.1 miLos Angeles, CA★★★★★4/5
Westlake Convalescent Hospital0.2 miLos Angeles, CA★★★★☆3/5
The Rehabilitation Center of Los Angeles0.2 miLos Angeles, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mid-Wilshire Health Care CNTR0.2 miLos Angeles, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pih Health Good Samaritan Hospital D/P SNF0.4 miLos Angeles, CA★★★★★5/5
Burlington Convalescent Hospital0.5 miLos Angeles, CA★★★★☆4/5
Grand Park Convalescent Hospital0.6 miLos Angeles, CA★★★★☆4/5
Alta View Post Acute0.7 miLos Angeles, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
California Post Acute0.7 miLos Angeles, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Temple Park Convalescent Hospital0.8 miLos Angeles, CA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Olympia Convalescent Hospital0.9 miLos Angeles, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Alvarado Care Center0.9 miLos Angeles, CA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Los Angeles →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055704.