Alden Terrace Convalescent Hospital
1240 S Hoover St, Los Angeles, CA 90006 · Los Angeles County · 210 certified beds · avg 194 residents/day · certified since Sep 25, 1970
Part of chain: LONGWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 20, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (35)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. |
| Nov 20, 2025 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Jan 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint |
| Jun 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jun 4, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| May 20, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Feb 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2024 | Payment Denial | 8 days from Jun 19, 2024 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.26 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 11% in California; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 43% in California; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.93 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 7% in California; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 24% in California; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 33% in California; top 16% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 26.7 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 30% in California; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 0.34, weekend 3.78. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 09/25/1970 |
| Ira D Friedman 1991 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 09/25/1970 |
| Lehmann Family 1991 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 09/25/1970 |
| The Klavan Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 09/25/1970 |
| The Tzippy Friedman Notis 1990 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 05/06/2020 |
| Alden Terrace Investments, LTD | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Cruz, Shirley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2008 |
| Cruz, Shirley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2008 |
| Friedman Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Friedman, Aaron | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2025 |
| Friedman, Aaron | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Friedman, Aaron | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Friedman, Ira | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Friedman, Ira | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Friedman, Ira | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Friedman, Ira | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Hadadz, Ali | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2012 |
| Hadadz, Ali | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2012 |
| Ira D Friedman 1991 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Klavan, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
- "How many residents share each room, and what options are there for more privacy?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvarado Care Center | 0.1 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Olympia Convalescent Hospital | 0.1 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| California Post Acute | 0.3 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Alta View Post Acute | 0.4 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Grand Park Convalescent Hospital | 0.5 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Burlington Convalescent Hospital | 0.6 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pih Health Good Samaritan Hospital D/P SNF | 0.7 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mid-Wilshire Health Care CNTR | 0.8 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Angels Nursing Health Center | 0.9 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bonnie Brae Skilled Nursing | 1.0 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westlake Convalescent Hospital | 1.1 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Rehabilitation Center of Los Angeles | 1.1 mi | Los Angeles, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Los Angeles →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056237.