CaliforniaFremont

Fremont Healthcare Center

39022 Presidio Way, Fremont, CA 94538 · Alameda County · 115 certified beds · avg 103 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1974

Part of chain: MARINER HEALTH CARE (17 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$12,051
Fines, last 3 years
4.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Nov 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 16, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Dec 16, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 16, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking.
Dec 16, 2021B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 13).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202180E
202480E
2025130E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,051.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 6, 2024Fine$12,051

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.644.313.95top 23% in California; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.760.610.69top 19% in California; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.293.903.50top 21% in California; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.510.48top 35% in California; top 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.036.745.8top 49% in California; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.838.142.9top 25% in California; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 0.68, weekend 3.82. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
GC Holding Company 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest99%06/30/2015
Grancare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
Grunstein, EmilyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/06/2019
Mariner Health Care, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
MHC Holding CompanyOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
MHC West Holding CompanyOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
National Senior Care, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/30/2015
Caramba, EspinitoIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2023
Caramba, EspinitoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2023
Caramba, EspinitoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/29/2023
Fremont Holding Company GP LLCOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2015
GC Holding Company 2 LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2015
Ghimire, ShankarIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2019
Ghimire, ShankarIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2019
Sarcauga, DennisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2025
Sarcauga, DennisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2025
Sarcauga, DennisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/06/2025
Ubando, JuliusIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Ubando, JuliusIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Ubando, JuliusIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Crestwood Manor - Fremont0.7 miFremont, CA★★★★★5/5
Crestwood Treatment Center1.0 miFremont, CA★★★★★4/5
Country Drive Post Acute1.1 miFremont, CA★★★☆☆3/5
We Care Skilled Nursing - Fremont1.1 miFremont, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Mission Valley Post Acute1.2 miFremont, CA★★★★☆3/5
Niles Canyon Post Acute2.1 miFremont, CA★★★★★5/5
Masonic Home4.0 miUnion City, CA★★★★☆4/5
Eden Healthcare Center7.9 miHayward, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Emmanuel Post Acute Care - Hayward8.3 miHayward, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Hayward Post Acute8.6 miHayward, CA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fremont →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056422.