MinnesotaDetroit Lakes

Emmanuel Nursing Home

1415 Madison Avenue, Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 · Becker County · 57 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1987

Part of chain: ECUMEN (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$53,847
Fines, last 3 years
5.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 28, 2026 · F-0808 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.

Why it matters: A special diet handled without proper medical oversight may not be safe or right for the resident's condition.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 23, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 20, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 28, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Oct 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 4, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202430D
202531G ▲
202661J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $53,847.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 28, 2026Fine$53,847

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.134.833.95top 35% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.711.220.69top 12% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.414.273.50top 40% in Minnesota; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.820.690.48top 25% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.742.245.8bottom 30% in Minnesota; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.038.642.9top 40% in Minnesota; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.57, RN 1.52, weekend 3.93. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CDL Homes, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/28/2004
Andresen, AngelicaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Andresen, AngelicaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/24/2023
Andresen, AngelicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2020
Andresen, AngelicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2020
Anzel, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2019
Anzel, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/12/2019
Augustson, JeanetteIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2022
Augustson, JeanetteIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2022
Augustson, JeanetteIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2022
Bartnes, JaniceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/11/1998
Beeson, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/24/2019
Bergstrom, SusanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2025
Bergstrom, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2025
Bergstrom, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2025
Bohlen, HollyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2024
Bohlen, HollyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/05/2024
CDL Homes, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2004
CDL Homes, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2004
Conlin, JanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Essentia Health Oak Crossing0.6 miDetroit Lakes, MN★★★★★4/5
Frazee Care Center8.3 miFrazee, MN★★★★★4/5
Sunnyside Care Center11.3 miLake Park, MN★★★★★4/5
Perham Living18.8 miPerham, MN★★★★★5/5
Pelican Valley Health Center20.0 miPelican Rapids, MN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Detroit Lakes →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245489.