How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Fallbrook Skilled Nursing
325 Potter Street, Fallbrook, CA 92028 (opens Google Maps) · San Diego County · (760) 728-2330· 93 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PROGRESSIVE HEALTH CARE CENTERS (5 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 1, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Sep 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| May 1, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor a resident's right to choose their own attending doctor. Residents get to decide which physician oversees their care. · from a complaint · F-0555 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 18, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.53
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.37
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.98
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.53 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 28% in California; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.37 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 25% in California; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.98 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 34% in California; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 7% in California; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.9 | 36.7 | 45.8 | bottom 36% in California; top 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 18% in California; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.31, weekend 3.38.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fallbrook Skilled Nursing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avila, Stephanie | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/23/2015 |
| Avila, Victor | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/23/2015 |
| Goings Family Trust Dated February 18, 2005 | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 01/23/2015 |
| Goings, Verna | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/23/2015 |
| Helen Louise Larson Revocable Trust Created Under That Certain Declara | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/23/2015 |
| Larson, Maria | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/23/2015 |
| The Herman J Tanske Trust Dated May 28, 1987, as Amended | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 17% | 01/23/2015 |
| The Larson Family Trust of 2010 as Amended | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/23/2015 |
| Victor Avila Family Trust Dated January 26, 1990 | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 33% | 01/23/2015 |
| Goings & Goings INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2015 |
| Goings, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2015 |
| Kilian, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2015 |
| McDonald, Jason | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/20/2015 |
| Pisco, Mary Jean | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/20/2015 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Progressive Health Care Centers — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Heritage Gardens Health Care Center — Loma Linda, CA · overall 4/5
- Parkview Healthcare Center — Anaheim, CA · overall 4/5
- Stanley Healthcare Center — Westminster, CA · overall 3/5
- Valley Healthcare Center — San Bernardino, CA · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "If my family member wants to keep or change their doctor, how do you handle that request?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 13 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temecula Healthcare Center | 10.8 mi | Temecula, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Santa Fe Post-Acute | 10.9 mi | Vista, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Springs Health and Rehabilitation Center | 12.1 mi | Murrieta, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Vista View Post Acute | 12.5 mi | Vista, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vista Knoll Specialized Care Facility | 13.2 mi | Vista, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pacific Villas Post Acute | 13.6 mi | Oceanside, CA | —/5 | ||
| La Paloma Healthcare Center | 13.6 mi | Oceanside, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Murrieta Health and Rehabilitation Center | 13.7 mi | Murrieta, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bayshire Carlsbad | 15.0 mi | Carlsbad, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Carlsbad by the Sea | 16.5 mi | Carlsbad, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Village Square Healthcare Center | 17.3 mi | San Marcos, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community | 17.7 mi | Escondido, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in San Diego, CA — 83 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Friendship Manor Nursing & Rehab Center — National City, CA · overall 5/5
- Glenbrook — Carlsbad, CA · overall 5/5
- Golden Hill Post Acute — San Diego, CA · overall 3/5
- Granite Hills Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LLC — El Cajon, CA · overall 2/5
- Grossmont Gardens Healthcare Center — La Mesa, CA · overall —/5
- Grossmont Hospital D/P SNF — La Mesa, CA · overall 5/5
- Grossmont Post Acute Care — La Mesa, CA · overall 4/5
- Helen Bernardy Center D/P SNF — San Diego, CA · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055298.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).