Bayshire Carlsbad
3140 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 · San Diego County · 45 certified beds · avg 41 residents/day · certified since Oct 4, 1999
Part of chain: BAYSHIRE SENIOR COMMUNITIES (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.52
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (24)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Mar 21, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Apr 28, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.52 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 11% in California; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 28% in California; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.95 | 3.90 | 3.50 | bottom 3% in California; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.93 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 9% in California; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.1 | 36.7 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in California; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 18% in California; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.34, RN 0.99, weekend 4.48. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bayshire Continuing Care LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2024 |
| Skilled Camino LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/01/2021 |
| Coleman, Chad | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2023 |
| Coleman, Chad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Daynes, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Daynes, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2023 |
| Johnson, Denise | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Kirby, Scott | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2020 |
| Kirby, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Kirby, Scott | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Shali, Reyzan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Skilled Camino LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlsbad by the Sea | 2.0 mi | Carlsbad, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| La Paloma Healthcare Center | 2.0 mi | Oceanside, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pacific Villas Post Acute | 2.0 mi | Oceanside, CA | —/5 | ||
| Vista Knoll Specialized Care Facility | 2.6 mi | Vista, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Vista View Post Acute | 3.9 mi | Vista, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Santa Fe Post-Acute | 5.7 mi | Vista, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Square Healthcare Center | 7.5 mi | San Marcos, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Glenbrook | 7.7 mi | Carlsbad, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Dorothy & Joseph Goldberg Healthcare Center | 8.6 mi | Encinitas, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aviara Healthcare Center | 9.5 mi | Encinitas, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555745.