OregonSalem

Salem Transitional Care

3445 Boone Road SE, Salem, OR 97317 · Marion County · 80 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1993

Part of chain: CASCADIA HEALTHCARE (46 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$22,523
Fines, last 3 years
4.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 15, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 23, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 16, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Nov 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202240E
202310D
2024111G ▲
2025121G ▲
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $22,523.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 12, 2024Fine$22,523

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.345.423.95bottom 2% in Oregon; top 28% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.520.780.69bottom 25% in Oregon; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.904.853.50bottom 4% in Oregon; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.480.48bottom 14% in Oregon; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.847.445.8top 47% in Oregon; top 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.651.642.9bottom 32% in Oregon; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.81, RN 0.58, weekend 4.32. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation · changed ownership in the last 12 months

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cascadia HC Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Cascadia Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Cascadia Oregon Operations LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Laforte, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/06/2025
Hammond, OwenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Hammond, OwenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Harbert, ShawnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/23/2026
Harbert, ShawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2026
James, PatrickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
James, PatrickIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/21/2025
Ruden, NathanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Ruden, NathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/21/2025
Salem 3445 Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
White Oak Healthcare Finance LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside2.5 miSalem, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Tierra Rose Care Center4.4 miSalem, OR★★★★★5/5
Windsor Health and Rehabilitation4.8 miSalem, OR★★★☆☆3/5
Keizer Nursing and Rehabilitation7.2 miKeizer, OR★★★☆☆3/5
Avamere Court at Keizer8.4 miKeizer, OR★★★★☆4/5
Independence Health and Rehabilitation11.0 miIndependence, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Mt Angel Health and Rehabilitation15.6 miMount Angel, OR★★★★☆4/5
Dallas Retirement Village Health Center16.5 miDallas, OR★★★★☆4/5
Timberline Post Acute18.4 miAlbany, OR★★★★★4/5
Regency Albany18.9 miAlbany, OR★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center19.1 miWoodburn, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Salem →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385234.