916 Pacific Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 (opens Google Maps) · Snohomish County · (425) 382-2800· 62 certified beds · avg 59 residents/day · certified since Jun 5, 2020 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 15, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 9, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $14,380.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | Fine | $14,380 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.95 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in Washington; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.22 | 0.91 | 0.69 | top 13% in Washington; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.50 | 3.69 | 3.50 | top 46% in Washington; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.96 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 12% in Washington; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 56.8 | 45.1 | 45.8 | bottom 18% in Washington; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 68.0 | 45.4 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Washington; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.26, RN 1.32, weekend 3.78.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.26 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Everett Transitional Care Services. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Health & Services-Wa | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 01/05/1995 |
| Bauguess, Tristine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
| Bauguess, Tristine | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
| Bethany of the Northwest | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Bethany of the Northwest | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/27/2025 |
| Block, Allison | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Combs, Scott | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2019 |
| Degroodt, Patricia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Hovey, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Hovey, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Jacobson, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Lemke, Kristi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Lemke, Kristi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Onerheim, Paul | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2019 |
| Peterson, Jason | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2022 |
| Providence Health & Services-Wa | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2025 |
| Scrivens, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/06/2019 |
| Scrivens, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
| Scrivens, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2025 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethany at Pacific | 1.3 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| View Ridge Care Center | 1.9 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Madison Post Acute | 2.9 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mountain View Rehabilitation and Care Center | 5.6 mi | Marysville, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Everett Center | 5.8 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bethany at Silver Lake | 6.0 mi | Everett, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Marysville Care Center | 6.3 mi | Marysville, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Snohomish Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 7.0 mi | Snohomish, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 10.6 mi | Lynnwood, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Lynnwood Post Acute Rehabilitation Center | 11.1 mi | Lynnwood, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bothell Health Care | 12.8 mi | Bothell, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine Ridge Post Acute | 12.9 mi | Edmonds, WA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Snohomish, WA — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505533.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details